The Chatti Alans (Catalans), according to Isaac Newton

Previous image: Image of King Saint Stephen, in the Hungarian Illustrated Chronicle.

Published in CHRONOLOGIA.ORG. On line [On August, 2022].

Published in ACADEMIA.EDU. On line [On August, 2022].

The Chatti Alans (Catalans), according to Isaac Newton

© Andreu Marfull Pujadas

August 3, 2022

In the book LA VÍA CRONOLÓGICA (2020, La Tempestad) (“THE CHRONOLOGICAL WAY”) it was indicated that the stories of the Visigoth, Merovingian and Carolingian kings, were linked (according to tradition and various studies) with the lineage of Jesus through Mary Magdalene, and were related to that of the Catalan counts. They were through the Exilarchs of Babylon, the Jewish prince-kings of Narbonne, who appear at the (official) time of the arrival of the Saracens in Hispania. They, the Exilarchs, are known as descendants of King David, the biblical one. This is official although hardly anyone is aware of it. In other words, a duplicate thread of history was pointed out between both events, on the one hand that of the Saracens and that of the Exilarchs in the time of the Carolingian and Catalan counties, and, on the other, that of the Visigoths and the Merovingian Franks. Technically, means that the Catalan counts are assimilated to Jewish and Visigoth powers of great military power and to a powerful symbolic authority, from the house of King David, and these are also Saracens, and, in the same way, the Franks are assimilated with powers twinned with the Jews and the Visigoths, that may also be invaders. The research that supports it is the New Chronology by Fomenko and Nosovskiy, since it shows that all history prior to the 18th century AD has been expanded by multiple duplications as official history was written (and manipulated), along with “sacred” history.

But this is not all. In the cited book it was also said that the battle of Poitiers (official year 732) in which Charles Martel pushed back the Saracens, was a reflection of the battle of the Catalaunian Plains (official year 451), understood almost two centuries ago. To situate the reader, remember that with Poitiers the first steps are created for the creation of the “Hispanic Mark” that gives rise to the Catalan counts and the Carolingian Empire, and with the Catalaunian Plains the Visigothic lineage that occupies Hispania is consolidated and the Frankish kingdom is born. In Poitiers the protagonists are the Carolingian kings, and in the Catalaunian Plains the protagonist kings will be the Merovingians, who are “born” shortly after, and the Visigoths. Coincidences are important. Also, in the binomial Narbonne-Toulouse (in which Barcelona then enters) appear, first, the Visigoths, and then the Catalan counts in a surprisingly parallel history to that of the Jewish powers (the Exilarchs). And what is also significant: in Narbonne the first Visigothic kingdom appears, and then the first Catalan county power, this second in parallel to the Jewish royal power, and, before (according to the official history) the first Christian archbishopric that dominates this territory “Roman”. Everything seems like a coincidence, but the “neochronological glasses” help to see another explanation.

This story is interesting enough to follow the thread, but not much more work was done on the book LA VÍA CRONOLÓGICA because the main theme was universal sacred history and its integral manipulation, not the specific case of the Exilarchs and the Catalan counts. That is to say, it deals with a sacred history that not only points to a manipulation between Poitiers and the Catalaunian Plains, but to another much more monumental one.

But since 2020 the work has followed its thread, double, and has advanced. On the one hand, with the involvement of Daniel Bellò, who opens the blog “La Història Usurpada” (with whom I have shared research for years) and comes across the thread of the “Catalauni”, which various sources make present at the time of the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains and, according to various interpretations, may be the root of the Catalans. It is even implied that they were on the Gallic and Roman (and Visigothic) side that is said to have defeated the Huns, commanded by Attila. Thus, an attractive narrative thread is created for the Catalans, assimilating them with some “irreducible Gauls” (such as Asterix and Obelix) who “resist now and always the invader” (in this case Tartar), and receive a lot of acceptance (although being strict with reality, this acceptance is very relative). On the other hand, however, LA VÍA CRONOLÓGICA points in another direction. He says that the Catalan counts come from the East, like all the Indo- European powers that have occupied Europe throughout history (with the permission of the Celts and other assimilated peoples, about whom we know little). In this sense, the Visigothic and Jewish powers are compatible with this line, but not the Gallic-Catalan version. Likewise, the research is linked to the great work of Arthur Zuckerman, who in 1972 published a book in which he discovered the duplicities between the exilarchs of Narbonne and Toulouse with the equivalent Christian counts (mainly the Catalans), and pointed to a manipulation of history, in which (without saying it openly) the powers Jews have been deliberately replaced by Christian powers. This history is given by the Kalonymus, who in another complementary work is linked to Christopher Columbus. This Jewish current, despite not having any public echo, interests certain people, such as Josep Bastardas, who has been carrying out equivalent research for years (and for more than a year has shared concerns with the neochronological view). But it is not the only one, surely because the issue is controversial and highly sensitive to the historical consciousness that defines our identities, the Christian idea of ​​the West and the sacred books (the Bible and its imaginary).

However, all this searching is welcome, if it helps to connect the dots. The two investigations, Daniel’s and mine, seem to converge. Let’s see it:

  • Theodoric I of Narbonne and Toulouse, a Visigoth, died in the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains in the official year 451 AD, after the Visigoth lineage arrived in Barcelona at the hands of his brother or brother-in-law (the link is not really known), named Ataulf, who establishes the Visigothic royal palace there. Ataulf is the son of the first Visigoth king (Alaric) and marries Galla Placidia, daughter of the Roman emperor and born in Constantinople. Come on, she is a “princess” who, everything is said, marries in Narbonne and locates her palace in front of the Call Jueu in Barcelona (the Jewish quarter).
  • Theodoric I of Narbonne and Toulouse, officially Frank, dies in a battle in Pannonia, in the official year 793, against the Avars. But Zuckerman establishes that he is not a Frank but an Exilarchic Jew. He is the first Jewish exile, named Theodoric, which means “king of the people.” He is actually called Makhir and is of the lineage of the biblical King David, and born in Babylon. His son (this is official again) is Saint William of Gellone, ​​who is believed to have him with Charles Martel’s daughter, Alda, and in the official year 801 they capture Barcelona. That is to say, he also marries a princess, and it is believed that they marry in Narbonne, where he has his capital.

As can be seen, this parallelism is spectacular, and it would be even more so if the Visigothic Theodoric I was also Ataulf. And it could be, because Theodoric is an “alias” and a Latinized denomination, which was very common in ancient times (I am referring to putting several names to the same character according to the sources and the author of the texts).

Likewise, another work seems to help clarify how the Catalan count powers must be understood, and the triplicate history of the Visigothic, Christian and Jewish powers. Isaac Newton’s 1733 book titled OBSERVATIONS upon the PROPHECIES of DANIEL, and the APOCALYPSE of St. JOHN has recently been studied again. This book is essential for the New Chronology, as pointed out in LA VÍA CRONOLÓGICA, but a more in-depth study remained to be done. The book deserves a contextualization but here, in order not to lose the thread of the “Catalauni”, it is only said that it is an “encrypted” book that comes to say how the Bible should be interpreted and place it in the Middle Ages, in the line neochronology of Fomenko and Nosovskiy. In this book it is said that all the Goths come from present-day Eastern Europe, and the Visigoths from Pannonia, and spoke the same language. He says, literally:

Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Vandals, Gepides, Lombards, Burgundians, Alans, &c. who all agreed in their manners, and spake the same language.

He makes them all Goths and highlights that the Vandals and the Alans united and occupied Spain and North Africa, in the early 5th century, before the Visigoths arrived. But he adds:

the Kings of the Vandals styled themselves Kings of the Vandals and Alans; as may be seen in the Edict of Hunneric recited by Victor in his persecution. In conjunction with the Chatti, these Alans gave the name of Cathalaunia, or Catth-Alania, to the Province which is still so called. These Alans had also Gepides among them; and therefore the Gepides came into Pannonia before the Alans left it. There they became subject to the Hunns till the death of Attila A.C. 454, and at length were conquered by the Ostrogoths.

Here is the root of the “Cathalaunis” (the Catalans), who were half Chatti and half Alans and were part of the so-called Vandals who occupied the West from the East. The Alans come from the Caspian Sea, and then they reach the Crimea, to end up entering Western Europe (like the Huns), while the Visigoths, with the Ostrogoths, are said to also come from nearby, from the steppes of present-day Ukraine. And the Chatti? this is not explained by Newton, but historians place them near the Catalaunian Plains and know very little about them. In this sense, regarding the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains, it should be clarified that, officially, the Gallic and Roman army that stopped Attila’s Huns also included the Alans, Visigoths, Burgundians and other Gothic peoples, in the same way as the Huns, who fought with the Gepids, the Scythians, the Avars, the Ostrogoths and many others. In other words, it was a great fight between “brothers”, not a fight between the original peoples and the invaders. This is important, as it breaks stereotypes and helps to see the Tatar struggle that preceded the division of the territories. Also, what does Newton say about the Catalaunian Plains? He says that Gaul was occupied by the Alans and there was a rebellion in the aforementioned fields, where the Alans and the Chatti are said to have been. Specifically Newton says:

Ætius and the Barbarian Kings of Gallia came to raise the siege, and beat the Hunns in a very memorable battle, A.C. 451, in campis Catalaunicis, so called from these Alans mixt with the Chatti. The region is now called Campania or Champagne.

That is to say, the place of the battle receives the name where the “Catalaunis” were, half Huns and half Chatti. And it does not make clear which side they were on, although it seems that Attila’s. In any case, they were invaders, Vandals, like the Hungarians, who are half Huns and half Avars (as the official history acknowledges). This struggle is due to the great superiority of the Tartars who, throughout the Middle Ages (officially throughout the centuries but neochronologically in a short time) occupied Eurasia and North Africa.

So far we see that, according to these sources, the Catalans were not Gallic powers but Tartars, with the point and apart from the chatti, who remain mysterious, … like the Jewish exilarchs. In this line, where should we place the Jews? were the chatti? It may be, but to understand it well it is necessary to put on neochronological glasses (and that requires a lot of work and a good dose of pragmatism with the official history). Also, an approximation is made here. Nineteenth and twentieth century studies conclude that the Chatti, or Khatti, also Hatti, were the Hittites cited in the Bible, which is believed to have come from Anatolia at the time of the Egypt of the Pharaohs and Babylon, and settle in Canaan at the time of Abraham. In fact, they sell the lands of Hebron where Abraham buries his wife Sarah, who marries the Pharaoh of Egypt. And from that sepulcher is born the temple of the lineage of the people of Israel. They are contemporary and protagonists in time, for example, of the Pharaoh Akhenaten. And what became of them? They are said to disappear with the invasion of the Middle East by the “peoples of the sea” after Moses left Egypt. And… does this fit with the facts of the High Middle Ages? Of course, because they spread through “Tartaria” and Babylon, even Occitania (Gothia) after passing through the Crimean Gothia, like the Vandals. And that, as much as it is hard to believe, did not happen thousands of years ago, but in the current imaginary of the Middle Ages, as the New Chronology points out (and demonstrates, despite not having answers for everything, logically). In fact, as Newton explains, when placing the biblical prophecies, precisely, in the Middle Ages.

Doing an additional neochronological reading, as a result of this invasion the Carolingian Empire was born, allied with the original Roman powers (which have little to do with the official Romans), crowning “beasts” as prophesied in the sacred text. And the Kingdom of Israel, that of Canaan, should be understood as a work of the Order of the Temple of Solomon (of which Newton does not speak, curiously). And yes, in the case of the Templars, we must also see chronological leaps, such as that of the Tartars, who have been duplicated in various histories (Babylonians, Persians, Tartars and peoples of the sea, Turks, Mongols…) of their lineage, the of Genghis Khan, and his marriage alliances with all the peoples of the world, just as Moses proclaimed. This fight is that of the Apocalypse, written in a prophetic key to hide the real story and make it… sacred, in every sense, both in the sacred religious sense and in the sacred historiographical, although little by little they are shown as they were: brutal and fascinating at the same time, tinged with manipulative legend, to legitimize the fearful royal (and spiritual) power of being recognized as an invader.

And, as a clue to the great manipulation that is hidden, highlight that the Visigoths and the Huns are said to have sacked Rome, while the Carolingians liberated it. Actually, they occupied it. It was a Tartar occupation, of the powers that would be the true Roman Empire, as the New Chronology concludes. That is why the Vatican is outside the walls of the city of Rome, like a “Military Citadel”, and refers to the Tatar Batu Khan, the grandson of Genghis Khan. Batu Khan, Vatican.

Related Posts:

Columbus, the Christianized Hebrew power, according to Chronology X-185

Kalonymus, Colom, Colón, according to Chronology X-185

Spinoza denounced history and its official chronology up to the 17th century


Deixa un comentari

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

Esteu comentant fent servir el compte Log Out /  Canvia )

Facebook photo

Esteu comentant fent servir el compte Facebook. Log Out /  Canvia )

S'està connectant a %s